A New ‘Mindbenders’ Review!
Keep track of the characters for this one, because each one is critical to the story; each one is different (and interesting). For instance, you don’t want to forget the bearded guy, because he shows up again near the end. Of course, the nice part about having the book on Kindle is that you can do a search for “bearded” if you don’t remember him.
Other reviewers have written a precis of the plot, so I will skip that part. Quick review: Plot? Excellent. Setting (especially Rome)? Superb. Characters? Very good. Dialogue? I got lost sometimes and had to figure out who was speaking; otherwise, top notch. Denouement? Quite satisfactory.
Krever loves to use similes. Sometimes overmuch. But they’re such good ones, all is forgiven.
–Full as a python in mid-cow [ever feel that way?]
–buzzing like a bee on steroids [yup, Fiat 500 sounds just like that, so do Vespas]
–like trying to push a ham through a sieve [nearly choked on my coffee on that one!]
–The Coliseum shown [sic] through the dark streets like the world’s grandest jack o’lantern [if you’ve ever seen the Coliseum at night you’ll appreciate the comparison]
and last, not really a simile, but I just had to share it
–marble floors, dark wood booths and cathedral-type windows, a bank being just a church for money anyway.
A really good writer, a thriller story, and a great sense of humor. What more could you ask?
-Thanks, Sarah. And don’t forget: Buy ‘Mindbenders’ now and get a copy of ‘After’ FREE! Details below on this page!
‘Mindbenders’ and ‘After’ FREE Package Deal!
Okay – it’s the February doldrums. Time to spice things up! (When you see exclamation marks, you know I’m in sales mode)
‘Mindbenders‘ is FREE today and tomorrow on Amazon as part of the Kindle Direct program.
And if you have ever acquired a copy of ‘Mindbenders’ – ebook or paperback, purchased with your own money (bless you), received as part of a giveaway on Amazon, Goodreads or Smashwords, as a gift from a (very cultured) friend or even from one of those nasty sites that infest your computer with viruses and bots (I had nothing to do with it) – you are eligible to receive a copy of ‘After’, my book of post-9/11 short stories, FREE as a bonus!
Just email me – the link is on the menu to your right (it’s the little envelope, for the visually challenged). In the subject line, type ‘After giveaway.’ For the message, type the last three words of ‘Mindbenders.’ Hit ‘Send’ and, shortly after receipt of your message, I will send you an e-copy of ‘After’ absolutely FREE!
For those of you who bought the ‘Mindbenders’ paperback on Createspace, this is IN ADDITION to my already-legendary ‘Buy a Book – I Buy You a Beer’ offer!
Anyway, act fast because, if you do, you might work up a sweat and burn off a few calories and that’s always good for your health, which your doctor would tell you except he or she would charge you a copay for the advice, while I’m tossing in that very same advice for FREE! How generous can one writer get? I exhaust myself sometimes…
Book Wars, Chapter Thirteen 1/2
Jenny Milchman sent me a typically well-reasoned response to my last post and it spurred a few additional thoughts. Here’s Jenny first:
‘Love your last graf! Well said, Ted, well said. I agree that anything that supports the primacy of books and stories is a good thing. Bringing more players into the bricks and mortar side of things is certainly a personal preference (nay, passion) of mine!
However, I read some wise words a few weeks ago, which said essentially that Amazon may not realize what they’re in for. There’s a reason the big 6 and bookstores operate as they do. These are some of the smartest book folks I’ve ever met–and the problems they’re trying to solve are HARD. Tricky edits. Weary authors. Plot twists that don’t quite work. Distribution, overages, and the almighty “Nobody knows [what sells].” Once Amazon is wading in those waters, they might see that bookselling–and publishing–is different than selling Aloe Vera lotion at the best price. I hope they’re up for it, because I welcome new players. But I wouldn’t underestimate those who have been in the game for longer.’
I think there’s a lot of sense in this, obviously, but I’m not sure Amazon has any intentions of ‘playing the game’ – at least not the game as presently constituted.
Whether Amazon works with experienced authors with followings (Barry Eisler, David Morrell) for their fiction titles or decides to publish (that is, create a paper version of ) any of their ebook authors, surely they’ll take those that are already selling, already fending for themselves and probably won’t need a whole lot of editing to keep pleasing their built-in readership. I’m not convinced Amazon will be doing multi-book deals and, even if they do, their relationship is not the same as the traditional agent/editor. I don’t know how much handholding writers will expect from them.
As to the job of physical bookselling, Amazon has huge advantages that could tip the balance and force major changes in the nature of bookstores.
We’re used to even modest bookstores stocking thousands of books on all subjects from all publishers. It’s that tremendous overhead that makes the business such a shaky investment and was a major factor, years ago, in establishing the practice of book returns.
Book returns are the bane of authors and book publishers but traditional booksellers won’t give them up. A book is published, thousands of copies printed and sent to bookstores to fill their orders. Then publisher and author wait ninety days to see how many of those books actually sell. If a title doesn’t sell well, toward the end of the ninety-day period, the bookseller returns the unsold copies to the publisher for full credit (at least, it was full credit when I worked in the book business some years ago – if anything’s changed, someone please correct me).
So a bookstore has three months to establish whether a new book has ‘legs’ or not. Actually, with the huge number of books being published these days, it’s likely to be more like three weeks! So, in addition to the real estate bookstores represent (Lots of shelf space! Big parking lots!), all this printing, storing in warehouses and shipping back and forth costs a lot of time and money .
Amazon’s decision to build bookstores doesn’t mean it will necessarily recreate those same weaknesses. Amazon could build modestly-sized bookstores showcasing just the few big Amazon-only titles – this month’s new books and whatever titles just keep on selling.
In addition, each store might only carry one copy each of Amazon’s other books – leaf through in the store, decide if you’re interested and we’ll ship it to you free! Five bucks shipping if you have to have it overnight!
Lots of customers would have no problem with that. And suddenly – No returns! You print minimal numbers, track sales on a real-time basis and print more when you need to, in small batches that cost a little more per copy but cost a whole lot less than pulping 3,000 unsold copies over and over again. Thereby eliminating a financial headache that’s tormented the book business for fifty years.
In addition, if I was Amazon (if I was Amazon, I wouldn’t be writing this silly blog but let’s ignore that for now), I’d also have an Expresso machine in each store.
If you really want a book and can’t wait, Expresso reads the files off a server, prints the book and cover, binds it all together and spits out the completed product in the store while you wait.
Amazon could offer this service to writers like me who have four paperbacks available through Createspace – it would be a huge advantage for us to be available in bookstores and would offer Amazon thousands of books available exclusively in their stores overnight, with almost no overhead.
I should mention here that I love the old-fashioned, cluttered idea-friendly bookstore and I have no idea if any of this describes Amazon’s plans. But it’s all well within Amazon’s capabilities and existing technology. More importantly, starting from scratch with a new approach to bookselling would make use of Amazon’s considerable advantages and minimize or eliminate several big weak spots in the existing approach.
So I’m excited about the prospect of Amazon adding stores and their energy to the bookselling game. But (and I’m less excited about this) that doesn’t mean they’ll play the same game as everyone else.
Book Wars, Chapter Twelve
I spent last weekend at Love Is Murder, a wonderful mystery/thriller/suspense writer’s conference in Chicago. You’ll probably hear more about it from me once I’ve had a good night’s sleep (or two).
However, one subject that kept coming up was the conflict between Barnes & Noble and Amazon. You’ve seen the articles: Amazon wants to conquer the book world! Monopoly power! B&N won’t sell Amazon’s titles in its stores! Barnes & Noble is the white knight who’ll save the publishing business (three or four years after it was the evil monster running around gobbling up independent bookstores)!
This is a treacherous subject for writers. We all want a vibrant marketplace for books with multiple venues and vendors. And the marketplace is so confusing – one of Amazon’s major strengths this far along was simply that they were the only player with a clear business plan.
So the news today that Amazon is looking into the possibility of opening their own retail stores is fascinating. The stores will reportedly concentrate on Kindles and the books published by Amazon’s own imprints. So all those titles that won’t be sold in your local B&N will have a local retail home – a major relief, I’m sure, to the authors who’ve signed book contracts with Amazon. Or who will be offered one in future.
But if Amazon does more than dip its toes in the water, this would seem to dictate an expansion of the Amazon printing business. If you really expect to drive people to your bookstore, you have to have a decent selection of titles. And doesn’t this move force Amazon to play on almost equal ground – real salespeople, rent, all the expenses the company has avoided thus far?
This could be very good for writers, happily watching powerful retailers duke it out over rival sets of books. Anything that promotes the central role of books and stories in our culture is a blessing, even if the blessing comes draped in a decidedly odd set of clothes.
Winter Idyll
It snowed yesterday.
Manhattan was a Stieglitz photo, drifting flakes muting the colors of the old town and rendering them pointillist and impressionistic.
I awoke with Smitty, serene and beautiful, asleep next to me, Zeus her cat snoring lightly on her other side and the sound of snow plows scraping the streets, happily without removing the white icing off this gritty cake of a city.
One of the blessings of experience is to recognize the memories while they’re happening. This one didn’t slip by.
Don’t Just Strike – Win!
Yesterday was very interesting.
The early headlines focused on who WASN’T totally in the protest, like anyone expected Amazon or Facebook (or Google, for that matter) to actually shut down business for the day.
But I think those stories actually had the opposite effect, because they reminded people of the possibility that these giants – who opposed SOPA and PIPA as fervently as the sites that did shut down – could have closed up for a day. Reminding people just how important this free Internet has become to our lives.
To be brief: The Internet does not yet have a body of law protecting the wide-open freedom of expression it has represented to now. There are no laws and only a few precedents that may or may not stand in court in future. The US created the Internet and has been its biggest backer up to now. So if we start restricting it (and people in power always want to control any potential rival for power), a lot of other countries will be all too happy to follow our lead and we all lose this incredible outlet, before it’s even had a chance to show its full potential.
Look at Arab Spring and the way Facebook has complicated all our lives (for good and ill) – could any of us have imagined such a world twenty years ago? It’s too soon to start cutting this thing down to size, because we don’t know what size that is yet.
I’m a content provider who hopes to (someday) make a real living off my copyrights. So I believe in copyright protection (though there’s a real discussion to be had about the details and the boundaries of fair use). Nonetheless, these bills are just bad legislation.
They make social media sites libel for the content their users put up, going way beyond existing court precedent. They allow corporations and government to restrict access to websites that have been accused of copyright infringement before the accusations have even been proved. That in itself is enough for me – due process is the minimal standard for law and these bills fail that test.
So yesterday was a big day, with big effect. Lots of votes changed yesterday in Congress. Today, it’s time to nail down the coffin lid. There’s a petition here -please sign it. It urges President Obama (who already noted his concerns with the bills earlier in the week) to veto either bill if it passes. With yesterday’s changes of heart on the part of cowardly politicians of both parties (thank heavens cowardice cuts both ways), there aren’t enough votes to over-ride a veto. So the President could drive a stake through the heart of this beast once and for all. Please invest a moment of your time to help make this happen.
Let’s keep the one resource regular people have that scares Rupert Murdoch, Barack Obama, Newt Gingrich and Hosni Mubarak (though maybe not Chuck Shumer – nothing scares Chuck Shumer!).
He Mattered
It’s Martin Luther King Day and it would be nice if we saw it as something more than just another Monday off or another sale. There are still plenty of us around who remember when he emerged and the state of our society and what he did. We ought to speak up at some point today because the contrast with our society today is instructive.
Dr. King came out of church and reminded people of their better natures. If you had a conscience, he knew how to reach it. The civil rights movement faced clubs and attack dogs and fire hoses and guns with dignity and discipline – and won. Americans love winners. But it’s important to remember that the Montgomery bus boycott was seven years before the ‘I Have a Dream’ speech and through most of that time, nobody connected with the movement would have put money on their odds of winning anything. Those people knew their own history and could see with their own eyes every day how their actions were hardening the fears of their opposition.
But what’s heartening about Dr. King’s story – and Mahatma Gandhi’s, for politically the stories are identical – is that the battle was won by embarrassing people with power into doing the right thing despite themselves, because they couldn’t look in the mirror anymore or speak to their friends at parties or their wives at the dinner table without shame. Dr. King and Gandhi banked on the consciences of people who showed no signs of having any and won unimaginable victories by doing so.
In an age when our leaders play chicken over phony issues and haven’t the courage to even attempt to discuss what’s at stake, we shouldn’t forget that, in living memory, it wasn’t always this way.
They didn’t have to give Martin Luther King a statue. All we have to do is remember who he was and what he did. He was a big man for real.
The Subway in the Parking Lot
They took the subway car out of Golden’s Deli today.
Golden’s wasn’t Katz’s, where Smitty took me a couple of months ago. But it was a real kosher deli on Staten Island, where knishes and pastrami aren’t as automatic as in the rest of New York City. And Golden’s was a family business that was thriving on Staten Island when I first got here, which is more than twenty years ago.
Their food was good but the magic, when my son was growing up, was the subway car – an ancient monstrosity with 200 coats of icky tan paint, overhead fans, wicker seats and tables inset under posters for Virginia Slims cigarettes, Ali vs. Frazier on Pay Per View television (!) and Elvis in Concert.
A quick online search suggests it’s an IND R1-R9 train, built (it says here) between 1930-1940, a line that soldiered on until the 70’s.
I remember both the cars and the posters. My son had no such memories—the car might as well have been built for Charlemagne, as far as he was concerned. What he knew was he could get a really good burger and thick crinkle-cut fries and sit in a subway car while eating them! The thrill was there when he was 10 and coping with his parent’s divorce and it was there a year or two ago, when he was 6’5″, in college and into video games and filmmaking.
So it was dizzying on several levels to see that subway car in the middle of a parking lot at 9 this morning. It was a piece of my life yanked out of place.
The crew attached chains to pull the thing onto a flatbed truck. Where’s it going? I asked the foreman. Brooklyn, he said. To storage. The family is looking for another location but, in the meantime, have to have a place for it. Is this the biggest thing you’ve ever moved? No way, he said, voice rising, we move everything. You name it, we move it. We move whole buildings, jack ’em up, move ’em all over.
A minute later, the chain pulling at the nose of the car snapped and thick metal pieces flew Godknowswhere. The crewman started laughing and pointing at the driver. ‘You said it wouldn’t hold!’ he said and the driver puffed up a bit, being right and all.
They replaced the chains with stronger ones and pulled again and this time, got the job done. As I was walking away, the foreman was on the phone to someone, saying ‘You’re escorting us, right? Okay, a few minutes, you’re escorting us.’
The owner of the Deli walked by – I asked him if he wanted to be in the photo. He shook his head. “It’s not a happy day for us,” he said. It’s an old story—the strip mall raised the rent so now the Deli’s just another empty storefront, to be replaced, surely, by some chain store that will shrug off the cost and add to the creeping sameness of America.
But what I felt, watching them haul that subway car onto the flatbed, is my son living now in Virginia while another of the places I connected with him is on a flatbed truck, heading for storage.
‘Crafty’ Review
‘A Crafty and Devious God’ is my first book. I don’t take it seriously, I put it online basically because I can’t disown my own work. But it got a very nice review today, which reminds me not to have such firm ideas about what might be useful to other people.
His writing is very natural, loose and easy, yet deep and thoughtful. I can tell he’s a man who has experienced life and not just lived it. The evidence is there in his prose.
I should caution the most prudish of people there is a fair amount of sexual material in the book, but it’s nothing explicit. Considering the backdrop of the story, it could have easily become that. Instead, Mr. Krever serves up an engaging character study. It’s a tale of a man who’s lost, looking for his way, and a girl who knows she is destined for great things and is determined to achieve it at all costs.
It’s a great read–enough to tear me away from my own edits for a time–and I look forward to Mr. Krever’s next book.
S.L. Madden